🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial move to ban social networking access for those under 16 is creating waves around the globe. Officials, child protection groups, and guardians are watching with great interest to see if this tactic will set a precedent for countries abroad.

Across Europe Movement

Throughout Europe, a growing number of countries are moving toward comparable measures.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the leader stating that phones and apps are "stealing our kids' youth". The policy is expected to be formalized next year.
• Norway is planning to implement a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to protect young people from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is working on a digital wallet to authenticate the age and identity of social media participants. Officials have stated that an similar ban remains "an tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has called on lawmakers to enact a proposal lifting the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a similar action, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Dutch government has advised families to prevent their youngsters from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has passed a symbolic resolution demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 without a parent decides otherwise is provided. While it warns of the "compulsive" design of these services, the move does not establish mandatory rules.

"A clear age limit is a good foundation," commented a leading European lawmaker driving the measure.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Approach

For the United Kingdom, the government has not ruled out a possible ban, arguing that "no option is off the table" but insisting any policy must be "supported by strong data".

Last year, momentum gathered behind a bill to impose restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately watered down. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the matter.

Advocacy groups have voiced concerns. An organization established by the loved ones of a young person who died after being exposed to disturbing platform posts suggests that a strict age ban might not improve online safety and could result in a "dangerous transition" of exposure when young people reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the refusal of the tech sector to create tools that are secure and fit for minors," said a leading child protection advocate.

The United States: A State-by-State Picture

Stateside, action is mostly unfolding at the local level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• The state of Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and limits late-night use.
• The state of Florida has passed a bill prohibiting under-14s from joining social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has passed a regulation restricting teenagers to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra use dependent on parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly enacted bills demanding guardian approval for under-16s to set up social media profiles.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from some figures to follow the Australian example, a federal ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

International Outlook

Beyond Europe and the US, other nations are similarly considering moves.

• The Malaysian government intends to ban social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

But, global agencies strike a more measured stance. The UN children's agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "may even backfire". The organization notes that the internet can be a "vital connection" for isolated youth and that government action should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to invest in user protection.

As this international conversation evolves, the steps of the Australian government and its followers demonstrate that governments globally are increasingly prepared to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.